Skip to main content

A letter to U.S. higher education stakeholders

Rudisang Motshubi, Doctoral Candidate at Iowa State University 

Dear U.S. Higher Education Stakeholders,

Like many aspiring scholars who wish to impact the U.S. higher education landscape positively, I am uncertain what being a higher education scholar entails. I have chosen to be daring and take a more vulnerable route in this blog post to provide a more authentic picture of where potential emerging scholars may be and show that we are not alone; I see you. It is okay not to know what you are doing and whether or not you are doing the right thing. Not knowing is part of becoming a higher educational scholar; the journey and process will eventually get you where you want to go and—more importantly—where you are supposed to be.

Reading the prior post about socialization reminded me clearly how being socialized into higher education involves knowing what you are doing. Let me explain. In some educational spaces, this idea of purpose is often described as your why in higher education, as well as other questions like what brings you to this work, why it matters, and why hiring committees or individuals should hire you or support your work. However, to answer these crucial questions, we, as emerging scholars, need to know or understand what we are doing and what led us here. As a scholar with multiple overlapping marginalized identities, these questions have a different meaning for me. Specifically, I need to ask and explore some of these questions because no one else has or will.

Being socialized in higher education involves knowing where you fit in higher education related to faculty hiring processes (O’Meara et al., 2020; Reece et al., 2019; White-Lewis, 2020). Multiple aspects of fit determine whether you do fit, but one that does not always come up is the amount of power you have as an individual in that setting. Does your identity allow you access to resources? Does your identity make it difficult for your voice to be heard? Does your identity prevent you from feeling like you fit? I bring up these questions because they determine to what extent scholars or practitioners feel like they belong in an educational environment and how much power they feel they have in those settings.

Additionally, suppose I, as an emerging scholar, feel like I belong in an educational setting. In that case, there is a higher possibility that I will be more confident in what I am doing because I feel I am where I am supposed to be. Belonging to an educational space also creates a sense of stability or security that our thoughts or ideas will not be stifled because those thoughts or expressions are allowed.

You may wonder why I am talking about abilities, power, and fit. Higher education is a beautiful place where—once we find out where we belong—we as scholars can feel empowered, happy, positively challenged, and—for the first time in our lives—at home and in peace. However, for some with marginalized identities, higher education is where we feel like we have no power, voice, or agency, which causes us to question if we know what we are doing. Confidence in what you are doing is a lot easier when you do not have invisible and visible forces fighting against your existence.

For students, faculty, and staff with marginalized identities, being socialized into higher education can be a taxing process that I do not wish upon anyone. For example, small things like attending academic conferences regularly, staying in a clean and safe hotel, wearing enough professional clothing, and attending networking or social events require specific forms of capital (Hallmark, 2019). For students from backgrounds where finances are a sensitive subject or not available, the traditional reimbursement models universities and colleges use do not recognize these students’ precarious realities. An additional nuance for students with financial barriers—specifically foreign scholars and students—face obstacles when they have limited resources or abilities for funding due to their nationality or immigration status. These financial barriers only hinder the academic and career development and advancement of our foreign scholars, students, and peers.

Access to higher education institutional spaces will always be difficult for students, faculty, and staff with marginalized identities. It isn’t easy because we are constantly entering spaces—for the most part—where we are not the majority. When you are not the majority in a space, it is natural to question whether you belong because you do not see people who look like you. You then sometimes question whether you know what you are doing because no one else looks like you, talks like you, and, even worse, thinks like you. These thoughts are not new, but I would like to provide a unique example to highlight these nuances further.

International Students of Color often face multiple barriers to U.S. higher education. No matter whether they go on to a college or university, International Students of Color are always few; there are rarely other students with similar backgrounds to them. International Students of Color may see other people who look like them but are not like them. For example, not all Black students have the same experiences as other Black students. Similarly, not all Asian students have the same experiences as their Asian peers. Even if two Black students are in the same residential hall, academic space, or event, their similar racial identity does not guarantee that they will get along or like each other just because they are the only People of Color in a space. Then there is also the challenge of understanding what it is like to be Black, Asian, Latin American, or Hispanic when you might identify more with your nationality, ethnicity, or tribe. This identity tension can sometimes contribute to foreign Students of Color questioning whether they belong on a university or college campus, even if they have gained access to that space through admission.

Why do issues of power, fit, and the racial experiences of international students matter? They help people with power in educational institutions to answer all-important questions: Do our marginalized students feel like they belong on campus? Do they feel like they belong here? Do they feel they have the power to change things if they voice their concerns? Do they have a support system of college-going peers, faculty, and staff to rely on for emotional, academic, and social support? Can our institution answer these questions fully with an emphatic yes? If not, what are we going to do about it?

Yours sincerely,

An uncertain higher educational scholar

 

References

Hallmark, T. (2019). Success comes at a price. Diverse: Issues in Higher Education. https://www.diverseeducation.com/students/article/15104282/success-comes-at-a-price

O’Meara, K., Culpepper, D., & Templeton, L. L. (2020). Nudging toward diversity: Applying behavioral design to faculty hiring. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 311-348.

 Reece, B. J., Tran, V. T., DeVore, E. N., & Porcaro, G. (Eds.). (2019). Debunking the myth of job fit in higher education and student affairs. Stylus.

White-Lewis, D. K. (2020). The facade of fit in faculty search processes. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(6), 833-857.

 

About the Author

Rudisang Motshubi is a doctoral candidate in the School of Education at Iowa State University. His research interests are focused on the experiences of underrepresented students in STEM education and exploring international student’s collegiate lives in U.S. higher education.

 

 

 


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Black Thriving and Flourishing in Higher Education: The Imperative for a New Research Agenda

By Agyemang Amofa Prempeh & Dr. Sydney Freeman, Jr. Black people continue to face significant challenges in higher education. The Underrepresentation of Black students in colleges and universities and a lack of Black faculty and administrators highlight the pressing need for targeted initiatives to foster Black thriving and flourishing on campuses. While valuable research has been conducted on concepts such as Black joy and a sense of belonging, a comprehensive research agenda on Black thriving and flourishing in higher education is still lacking. A research agenda on Black thriving and flourishing will provide a comprehensive approach to correct the existing disparities faced by Black students, faculty, staff, and administrators at predominately White institutions (PWIs). Such a research agenda may also lead to developing strategies that, when implemented, facilitate higher education campuses where Black people can reach their fullest potential academically and professio

Looking: Using Proximity-Based Dating Apps like Grindr and Scruff for Participant Recruitment in Education and the Social Sciences

Nick Havey Looking (for research participants)? Consider “the Apps”  If you’re familiar with the HBO series Looking, which explores very white queer life in San Francisco, or have used a dating app in the last 10 years, you might know “looking” as a one-word interrogative that says a lot. It mostly is meant as a lazy (or efficient) way of asking another user if they’re interested in casual sex, but you might be “looking” for research participants! Having a baseline understanding of how dating apps work is prerequisite for using them for research purposes, as understanding terms like “looking” and app-based norms can help researchers navigate confusing virtual spaces and build trust and rapport with potential participants.  I have used proximity-based dating apps as recruitment sites for two different research projects. One considers the state of queer sexual education and how queer collegians are responding to sex educations that were not inclusive of their experiences or desires, comp

Preparing for the (Non-Academia) Higher Education Job Market

I entered graduate school knowing that my higher-education doctoral degree would be the catalyst for changing my career path.  My original path through student affairs had been fulfilling but not sustainable. The long hours of evening events strained my relationships, and the pay and opportunities for advancement were few. Over time, my values shifted, and I was no longer willing or able to make the tradeoffs in my work-life balance and mental health often required in student affairs positions. I had a vague understanding that I would need further education to embark on a career in research in higher education, but what even was a research career?  I entered my graduate program knowing that a faculty role is the most commonly sought post-graduation career path. Additionally, I felt fortunate that my institution offered a Certificate in Institutional Research and some guidance for students who wanted to follow that path. Beyond those two options, I was unsure what else existed for me.

Feeling Toward a Pedagogy of Grief

Z Nicolazzo, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Center for the Study of Higher Education, University of Arizona Throughout the past two years, I have found myself periodically returning to a piece Alexander Chee (2020) wrote for The New York Times . In it, Chee discusses the parallels between the COVID-19 pandemic and the AIDS epidemic. When the piece was first published, I remember taking a long walk with a friend and talking about it. We both had vivid memories and personal connections to AIDS and were both trying to make sense of what was happening globally as COVID-19 ripped through communities. In one especially heart-rending moment in the column, Chee recounts a conversation with a friend who, in response to the rising death toll, shared, “‘I’m acknowledging them [the deaths], but I’m not feeling them, just like the old days. …That comes later’” (para. 8). That conversation between Chee and his friend was two months into the pandemic. We’re now over two years in, which woul

What Does It Mean to Use “GaoKao” Scores to Admit Chinese International Undergraduate Students in U.S. Universities?

Jia Zheng , PhD Student of the Higher Education, Student Affairs and International Education Policy Program, University of Maryland The Open Doors Report marked a fourth consecutive year of decline in international student enrollment since 2016 , with the number of international undergraduate students dropping by 2.4% during the 2018-2019 academic year (Institute of International Education [IIE], 2020). China remained the top leading country of origin for international students, constituting 35% of the total number of international students in U.S. universities (IIE , 2020). To attract more prospective Chinese international undergraduate students , an increasing number of private institutions in the U.S. are accepting the Chinese National College Entrance Exam scores (Gaokao scores) in lieu of SAT or ACT scores (Bennett, 2019).  Although Gaokao, SAT, and ACT are all high-stake standardized tests, they differ in  several areas. Gaokao is a 2-day college entrance exam administered by